Protect Indigent Defense Funding

Indigent defense is never a popular topic with lawmakers or the public. The concept of the government paying to help criminals go free runs contrary to conservative values. However, indigent defense is closely aligned with the most essential of conservative values: liberty and the regulation of government power.

The criminal justice system in the United States is the best anywhere. When our government chooses to accuse a person of a crime and restrict his or her liberty, there is a process the government must follow. Citizens, in the form of a jury, make the decision. While the government is represented by a lawyer to present its case, the accused is also represented a lawyer to challenge the government. When the two sides are matched, ultimately what the jury hears is the truth.

Yet many in this country are unable to afford to hire a lawyer or prepare a defense. Crime, for the most part, mainly affects the poorer members of our society. A society where liberty and justice is only available to those who can afford it runs contrary to core conservative values. It is why the effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed to all under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ever since Gideon v. Wainwright.

Our system is designed to protect its citizens from an overzealous government. If government is able to run roughshod over the poorest and weakest members of society, our society cannot be free. The men and women who work in the public defenders office and represent indigent persons accused of crimes act as a check and balance to government power on a daily basis.

However, indigent defense comes at a significant cost to the government. In this day and age of government cutbacks, the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council must struggle like every other government agency for funding.

In 2004, the General Assembly created the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council to ensure effective counsel for the poor. In order to fund this constitutional mandate, the Legislature also imposed an additional $15 charge on civil court filing fees. While these fees have generated between $41 million and $44 million annually, the state has only budgeted between $35 million to $38 million for indigent defense. This year, Gov. Nathan Deal has proposed a budget of $40 million for indigent defense. There is no guarantee that this level of funding will continue in future administrations.

Rep. Rich Golick (R-Smyrna), chairman of the House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, has proposed a constitutional amendment to ensure funding for indigent defense. HR 977 provides that the funds that collected from the civil filing fee add-on be used to support indigent defense and not other budget items. This resolution has made it out of committee and is going to the floor of the General Assembly. A two-thirds majority is required to approve a constitutional amendment and send it to the general public for a vote. All those who support liberty and justice for all should contact their representative to support this important amendment
.

 

The Right to Remain Silent

We have all heard the words over and over on television programs. "You have the right to remain silent. If you give up the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford one, one will be appointed to you at no charge." These words have been so stirred into our popular lexicon that there meaning has evaporated. For the most part, we are more worried about having our rights read than what our rights really really mean. In reality, the Miranda rights are seldom read at the time of an arrest and are only required to be read when the police are going to question a suspect.

The right to remain silent, or the right against self incrimination, is one of our most important constitutional safeguards. It is guaranteed to us both by the Fifth Amendment as well as the Constitution of the State of Georgia. The right against self incrimination frees us as Americans from hours of harassing, arduous and even tortuous interrogation by the agents of our government. However, this right is most important in its subtleties. It is easy to remember to, "take the fifth" when a uniformed police officer is screaming in your face. It is another thing to keep that same right in perspective when a detective is just trying to get you "tell your side of the story" in order to "clear up the details of the case".

Most people fall into the trap and decide to speak with law enforcement. It is human nature. Most of us are raised to respect authority and law enforcement is indeed authority. Further, most of us feel that if we can only explain the details of the situation, we can "square this situation away". However that is rarely the case. Law enforcement officers are trained to investigate in a very methodical manner. By the time they are calling people in questioning or interviews, they have developed a picture in their mind as what happened and the interrogation is designed to obtain facts that support the theory law enforcement has already developed. If anything, the police are striving to get a confession to bolster an already weak case.

If you are contacted by law enforcement and they want you to come and answer questions, the best thing to do is to contact a lawyer. If you cannot afford to have a lawyer come with you, then decline to speak with the police at all. You still may be arrested for the charges, but chances are, you would have been arrested had you spoken with the police. The difference is your chances of beating the case are much better.