October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month

This month it will be hard to miss the purple ribbons about Cherokee County as agencies and individuals promote awareness to a serious issue that plagues many households in our community. While the issue is far more pervasive than most can imagine, these victims are not alone and there are places and people they can turn to.

Family Violence is criminal behavior that cuts across all socio-economic layers and touches the lives of old and young, men and women, gay and straight and even rich and poor. One in five teens report that they are involved in a relationship where they have suffered physical, sexual or emotional abuse. Violence is not something that people outgrow in a relationship but only get s worse as a battering partner seeks to manipulate and control their partner.

Physical and mental abuse in the home is not related specifically to a alcoholics or drug abuse but is a separate and distinct problem. It is a condition that is borne of an acceptance in the use of violence means of control of another person. This situation is only magnified when children are involved. While they may not be the target of the violence, children raised in a violent atmosphere are more likely to grow up believing that violence in the family is acceptable, creating another generations of victims and abusers.

 




Violence within a relationship is something of a stigma that society has swept under the rug. For batterers it is acceptable to punish their partner to keep them in line while many of the victims believe that they deserve the treatment inflicted upon them. Family violence is a cycle in a relationship that builds a level of tension in the relationship until there is a explosive climax of violence followed by a relative calm. Many victims will provoke the violence in order to get to the following calm. The victims of Domestic Violence feel trapped in this cyclic pattern of tension, violence and calm.

The greatest misunderstanding about Domestic Violence is that the victims can just escape if they wanted to. The socio-economic pressures weigh heavily against the victim of Domestic Violence who wants to leave the relationship. Victims are usually isolated financially without the means to help while clergy and counselors emphasize the benefits of preserving the relationship. For many, the social stigma of becoming a victim prevents them from reaching outside the relationship for help while other victims are isolated from the community, family and friends by their batterers. In either case, the victims face a community that is not willing to accept the truth about the batterer or that real problem exists.

In Cherokee County there are resources for victims to turn to. The Cherokee Family Violence Center offers a crisis hotline and a shelter to accept the victims fleeing a violent relationship. Once there, the staff offers counselors that can help victims obtain restraining orders against their abusers, obtain financial resources to get the family on its feet and look for employment. There is counseling available to victims and their non-offending family members to help cope with the emotional impact of the violence. The Cherokee County Family Violence Center Center has the countries’ first Transitional Housing program that can place qualified families in to safe, stable affordable housing to help a family wracked by violence achieve independence.

The month of October is more than just a time to remember those who have endured or are still trapped by Domestic Violence but to become more aware of its presence in our community and society. A society that is aware of its signs and its impacts will make this crime socially unacceptable and make it possible to break the cycle of violence that many families live in.

 

Posted with Blogsy

The End of Spousal Privilege in Georgia

Lawmakers in Georgia are poised to change the balance of power in the prosecution of domestic violence. The Georgia House of Representatives approved HB 711 last month and sent it on to the Georgia Senate. The bill was approved without change and sent to the governor’s desk. Once it goes into effect, HB 711 will allow prosecutors to compel victims of domestic violence to testify against their abusive spouse. It also protects the communications between victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse and the agencies that are created to help them.

This changes an age-old loophole in the law that made it much more difficult for prosecutors to obtain convictions against battering spouses. The loophole, coupled with an 8-year-old opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States, severely tied the hands of domestic violence prosecutors and allowed batterers to go free. In recognition of the sanctity of marriage, a spouse has a general privilege as not to be compelled to testify against one another in criminal proceedings. This privilege became abused in the prosecution of domestic violence cases. Spouses, generally under pressure from their abusers, could refuse to take the stand to testify against the attacker.

Until 2004, prosecutors were able to get around this privilege with some creative legal maneuvering. Once spouses exercised their privilege to refuse to testify, the witness could be deemed to be legally unavailable, allowing the admission of hearsay statements of the victim to 911 operators and law enforcement officers at trial. This exception to the hearsay rule allowed prosecutors to present some very powerful evidence. But the noticeable absence of the victim on the witness stand or the noticeable presence of the victim in support of the batterer sent an equally powerful message to a jury as well.

In 2004, prosecutors were dealt another blow when the Supreme Court held in Crawford v. Washington that the admission of hearsay statements of unavailable witnesses was a violation of the Sixth Amendment in that an accused has a right to confront his accuser in court. This left prosecutors without a witness to many brutal attacks, trying to piece together cases with photographs of injuries and 911 recordings.

The new law will allow prosecutors to compel these victims to take the stand against their abusive spouses. Even if they fail to testify honestly, once these witnesses have testified, their prior inconsistent statements to law enforcement can be admitted to as evidence in trial. According to Solicitor General David Cannon, Jr., “Georgia was the last state to allow this privilege in domestic violence cases, but this bill will allow us to put some real teeth into prosecuting these cases. We will be able to make a difference.”

Eric Ballinger is private practicing attorney in Canton, GA. He serves as the attorney training coordinator for the Cherokee Family Violence Center and handles may pro-bono cases each year for victims of domestic violence.

 

Protect Indigent Defense Funding

Indigent defense is never a popular topic with lawmakers or the public. The concept of the government paying to help criminals go free runs contrary to conservative values. However, indigent defense is closely aligned with the most essential of conservative values: liberty and the regulation of government power.

The criminal justice system in the United States is the best anywhere. When our government chooses to accuse a person of a crime and restrict his or her liberty, there is a process the government must follow. Citizens, in the form of a jury, make the decision. While the government is represented by a lawyer to present its case, the accused is also represented a lawyer to challenge the government. When the two sides are matched, ultimately what the jury hears is the truth.

Yet many in this country are unable to afford to hire a lawyer or prepare a defense. Crime, for the most part, mainly affects the poorer members of our society. A society where liberty and justice is only available to those who can afford it runs contrary to core conservative values. It is why the effective assistance of counsel is guaranteed to all under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ever since Gideon v. Wainwright.

Our system is designed to protect its citizens from an overzealous government. If government is able to run roughshod over the poorest and weakest members of society, our society cannot be free. The men and women who work in the public defenders office and represent indigent persons accused of crimes act as a check and balance to government power on a daily basis.

However, indigent defense comes at a significant cost to the government. In this day and age of government cutbacks, the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council must struggle like every other government agency for funding.

In 2004, the General Assembly created the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council to ensure effective counsel for the poor. In order to fund this constitutional mandate, the Legislature also imposed an additional $15 charge on civil court filing fees. While these fees have generated between $41 million and $44 million annually, the state has only budgeted between $35 million to $38 million for indigent defense. This year, Gov. Nathan Deal has proposed a budget of $40 million for indigent defense. There is no guarantee that this level of funding will continue in future administrations.

Rep. Rich Golick (R-Smyrna), chairman of the House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, has proposed a constitutional amendment to ensure funding for indigent defense. HR 977 provides that the funds that collected from the civil filing fee add-on be used to support indigent defense and not other budget items. This resolution has made it out of committee and is going to the floor of the General Assembly. A two-thirds majority is required to approve a constitutional amendment and send it to the general public for a vote. All those who support liberty and justice for all should contact their representative to support this important amendment
.

 

Criminal Justice Reform: A Challenge for the 2012 Legislative Session

Each year, criminal justice is a serious concern for the Georgia Legislature.  Fighting crime is always an important platform for lawmakers, however with costs increasing and budgets tightening, changes need to be made to the $1 billion a year corrections system. While costs of corrections are increasing, many question whether or not business as usual is effective.

House Bill 265 from the 2011 session of the General Assembly created the Special Council for Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians. The Council, made up of appointees from the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the House and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia, was established to address the spiraling costs of crime and punishment. With help from the Pew Charitable Trusts, they were tasked to identify the current problems and make recommendations on how to best use the state resources. The Council made its report to the legislature on Nov. 1, 2011.

The Council found that prison population in the past two decades has doubled to nearly 56,000 inmates, placing 1 in every 70 adult Georgians behind bars. Projections show that by 2016, that inmate population will grow to 60,000.

Georgia’s prisons are already operating at 107 percent capacity. Much of this space is presently being taken by non-violent offenders. Yet this rising prison population is not deterring crime as recidivism—offenders returning to the community to commit new crime—remains unchanged.

Similarly, the Council found the state’s community based corrections systems are stretched to the point of becoming ineffective. As of 2010, there were 156,000 probationers and 22,000 parolees supervised in Georgia. Those charged with supervising these offenders are without the tools to rehabilitate as the services and programs that the officers refer offenders—particularly substance abuse and mental heath services—are insufficient and in some cases non-existent.

Overall, the Council found that business as usual in the criminal justice system in Georgia is going to break Georgians and needs to become more effective in preventing recidivism. In its November 2011 report, the Council made a three part recommendation that called for improving public safety and holding offenders accountable; focusing expensive prison beds on serious offenders; and examining the priorities of reinvestment of funds in the criminal justice system.

The overall plan outlined in the report calls on the system to strengthen community based corrections (probation and parole; allowing for increased supervision; and more resources for rehabilitation). The Council also saw a great deal of benefit in “accountability courts” that use a carrot and stick approach of intensive court supervision over a period of rehabilitation.

Offenders in these accountability court programs see a judge routinely and interact with a panel of counselors, probation officers and drug testing personnel on a daily basis. Offenders that are making progress are rewarded while offenders that slip spend short periods in jail. These courts presently function in several counties as “Drug Court” and “DUI Court” and are enjoying very successful numbers in both rehabilitation and preventing recidivism at costs far less than incarceration.  Accountability courts received attention last year as Governor Deal’s son, a Hall County Superior Court judge, oversees the drug court in that county.

While strengthening community based programs offers more opportunity for rehabilitation to non-violent offenders, it frees up the expensive bed space for serious violent offenders that need to be removed from society. To effectuate such changes will require a reinvestment of the funds spent on the criminal justice system. Money will need to be focused on community based treatment for mental health and drug treatment as well as funds to establish the statewide system of accountability courts.

Now, the task of breaking the centuries old model of crime and punishment in the State of Georgia is laid at the feet of the Georgia General Assembly just in time for the 2012 session. Implementing these changes is not only going to require a reinvestment of funds but also a change in the mindset of the many people and agencies that operate the criminal justice system. While many of the players are resistant to change, it is clear that Georgia can no longer afford business as usual.

It's Official: Casey Anthony More Hated Than O.J. Simpson

Americans have a love hate relationship with their criminal justice system. While we are very proud of our system that presumes innocence until proven guilty, we revile those who are found innocent that we have presumed guilty. According to the New York Post and Reuters, Casey Anthony has just made it to the top of the list of most hated people according to Americans participating in the poll. Ms. Anthony was propelled to celebrity status when she was charged with the murder of her own daughter, mainly due to the fact that she partied for a month before reporting the child missing. Then insuring that her own star will never fade, she was acquitted of the murder charge.

Ms. Anthony's status as most reviled is an endorsement for the American Criminal justice system. Right behind her is former football star O.J? Simpson who was also acquitted of a murder charge eighteen years ago. The Simpson trial proved that with enough money and a star studded team of lawyers innocence could be brought. However, Casey Anthony was defended by a team of court appointed and pro-bono lawyers representing a woman who could not afford to defend herself against the resources of the government that was willing to spare no expense to convict her.

Before Ms. Anthony stepped one foot into the courtroom, the media and pundits like Nancy Grace had convicted her of the the carve of murder. Yet a jury heard weeks of testimony, poured over hundreds of exhibits and heard both sides to exhaustion. The jury deliberated in this case, not just for hours but for days, and returned it's verdict of not guilty. Yes, despite the opinion of the expert pundits, the men and women who were actually sworn to fairly listen to all of the evidence decided that the government failed to prove its case for murder against Ms. Anthony. For that, she will always be hated.

Ms. Anthony's most hated status is proof that the system can work. Regardless of your opinion of Ms. Anthony, the verdict in her case is proof that the jury system is not merely a rubber stamp for the government or public opinion.

What Effect Does Fault Have in a Divorce?

by: Eric A. Ballinger, Esq.

The issue of fault is a complex when it comes to divorce. It usually is the straw that breaks the camel's back with regard to ending the marital relationship. While some refuse to recognize role that their own fault plays in the dissolution of their marriage, many are surprised at the roll that fault plays in the outcome of their divorce. In the modern divorce, fault plays a roll in determining the outcome of a divorce case, but it is not the sole decisive fact.

Into the late Sixties, fault was an essential element in a divorce case. Until the Georgia legislature adopted the "no fault" ground for divorce, there was a requirement of fault by one party for a spouses to divorce, even if they agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. In the modern divorce, there is no requirement of a finding of fault for the parties to divorce, however the issue of fault is legally relevant in deciding the issues that are ancillary to the divorce, division of assets and debts, alimony and even child custody.

Usually fault, adultery, alcoholism, drug addiction, abusive behavior and the like, are the facts that motivate a spouse to seek a divorce. These are usually the most emotional issues of the divorce and motivate the parties to press the issue. However, fault is not the only issue the court takes into consideration in deciding the issues before it and fault must be put into perspective. Many litigants are surprised when they find out that even in the face of a partner that has committed the most despicable acts, divorce is rarely a "winner takes all" proposition and there are no punitive damages in a divorce.

When reviewing the facts in a divorce case, it is important to look at the case from the through the lens that the judge sees the case. One thing to take into consideration is that divorce cases are heard by Superior Court judges. These are the same judges that hear murder, rape and child molestation cases as well in addition to their civil case load. This gives the judge hearing a divorce case a much different perspective than most civil litigants who have never experienced this sort of in their life.

In addition, the Court is weighing many other aspects in deciding the divorce case as well. A mother may have committed adultery, but still is a loving parent who has never exposed the children to her indiscretions. A Father may be a unemployed deadbeat, but if he has no money, how can he pay alimony? A husband may be a functional alcoholic but how will the children feel if he is cut out of their lives? A man my have brutalized his wife during the marriage but what is to be gained if he is left on the street destitute?

The Court also looks at the effect that marital fault has on the break up of the marriage. Is the fault complained of really the cause of the break up of the marriage or is is some remote act from years gone by? The truth of the matter that judges are used to hearing the many gripes that spouses have about each other and figure that in a divorce there is usually more then enough blame to go around. If the fault is from years gone by, the court will very likely treat the act as condoned. On the other hand, if one spouse catches the other in serious misconduct and acts decisively on it, the Court can will treat the issues seriously.

Most importantly, the Court looks at the fault issues as they may effect the minor children of the parties. While judges rarely loose sleep over what happens between adults, they are always looking out for the best interest of the children involved. Children that are exposed to alcohol, drug abuse, violence and even adulterous relationships are at risk. Regardless of the what has transpired between the parents, the Courts will take decisive action to protect children from these sorts of risks.

The effect that the fault issues will have on each divorce case varies. Much of it depends on the evidence presented. It also depends on the individual judge hearing the case. While evidence of fault is not the most important facts the Court needs to hear, it certainly will help the judge decide which of the two parties to inconvenience the most. It is important to consult an experienced family lawyer to help you put the issue of fault into persecutive for your divorce case.